summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch
blob: 3b384bf6e99e33f39c08d43b40111e28e78dea26 (about) (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
From 6db49eb8858023654084088c73d968e190aec491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:38:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] build: remove warnings with gcc 11

This removes some warnings which prevent a successful build with -Werror
which is enabled by default. I'm using gcc 11, so maybe others are not
getting this warnings yet.

In src/flash/nor/numicro.c the debug messages were misleadingly indented.
In src/target/arm920t.c the array size where smaller than expected from
the receiving function.

Change-Id: I66f5c6a63beb9f9416e73b726299297476c884d8
Signed-off-by: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6104
Reviewed-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles-openocd@earth.li>
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
---
 src/flash/nor/numicro.c | 6 +++---
 src/target/arm920t.c    | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
index 7609fa81c..1971daa24 100644
--- a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
+++ b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static uint32_t numicro_fmc_cmd(struct target *target, uint32_t cmd, uint32_t ad
 		retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
 		if (retval != ERROR_OK)
 			return retval;
-			LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+		LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
 		if ((status & (ISPTRG_ISPGO)) == 0)
 			break;
 		if (timeout-- <= 0) {
@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static int numicro_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, unsigned int first,
 			retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
 			if (retval != ERROR_OK)
 				return retval;
-				LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+			LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
 			if (status == 0)
 				break;
 			if (timeout-- <= 0) {
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ static int numicro_write(struct flash_bank *bank, const uint8_t *buffer,
 				retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
 				if (retval != ERROR_OK)
 					return retval;
-					LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+				LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
 				if (status == 0)
 					break;
 				if (timeout-- <= 0) {
diff --git a/src/target/arm920t.c b/src/target/arm920t.c
index 80f6d7045..a45dc6420 100644
--- a/src/target/arm920t.c
+++ b/src/target/arm920t.c
@@ -245,8 +245,8 @@ static int arm920t_read_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
 	uint32_t cp15_opcode, uint32_t address, uint32_t *value)
 {
 	struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
-	uint32_t *regs_p[1];
-	uint32_t regs[2];
+	uint32_t *regs_p[16];
+	uint32_t regs[16];
 	uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
 	struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
 
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
 {
 	uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
 	struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
-	uint32_t regs[2];
+	uint32_t regs[16];
 	struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
 
 	/* load value, address into R0, R1 */
-- 
2.35.1