diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'testing/source/gcc/patches')
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 126 deletions
diff --git a/testing/source/gcc/patches/PR100102-2.a1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e.patch b/testing/source/gcc/patches/PR100102-2.a1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 56394fc3f..000000000 --- a/testing/source/gcc/patches/PR100102-2.a1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,59 +0,0 @@ -From a1b3484a8e6c53c8084723e3f1738d402374198e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> -Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 12:56:34 -0400 -Subject: [PATCH] c++: alias member template [PR100102] - -Patrick already fixed the primary cause of this bug. But while I was -looking at this testcase I noticed that with the qualified name k::o we -ended up with a plain FUNCTION_DECL, whereas without the k:: we got a -BASELINK. There seems to be no good reason not to return the BASELINK -in this case as well. - - PR c++/100102 - -gcc/cp/ChangeLog: - - * init.c (build_offset_ref): Return the BASELINK for a static - member function. - -gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: - - * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C: New test. ---- - gcc/cp/init.c | 2 +- - gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C | 9 +++++++++ - 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C - -diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c -index b1123287300..1b161d526f6 100644 ---- a/gcc/cp/init.c -+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c -@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ build_offset_ref (tree type, tree member, bool address_p, - if (!ok) - return error_mark_node; - if (DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (t)) -- return t; -+ return member; - member = t; - } - else -diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C -new file mode 100644 -index 00000000000..aae778646dc ---- /dev/null -+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-73.C -@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ -+// PR c++/100102 -+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } -+ -+template <bool B1> using a = int; -+template <class T3, class T4> struct k { -+ static long o(); -+ template <class T5> using n = a<bool(k::o)>; -+ n<int> q; -+}; --- -2.27.0 - - diff --git a/testing/source/gcc/patches/gcc-no_fixincludes.diff b/testing/source/gcc/patches/gcc-no_fixincludes.diff deleted file mode 100644 index e152e0821..000000000 --- a/testing/source/gcc/patches/gcc-no_fixincludes.diff +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ ---- ./gcc/Makefile.in.orig 2018-03-09 09:24:44.000000000 -0600 -+++ ./gcc/Makefile.in 2018-05-02 12:25:43.958002771 -0500 -@@ -3004,9 +3004,9 @@ - chmod a+r $${fix_dir}/limits.h; \ - done - # Install the README -- rm -f include-fixed/README -- cp $(srcdir)/../fixincludes/README-fixinc include-fixed/README -- chmod a+r include-fixed/README -+# rm -f include-fixed/README -+# cp $(srcdir)/../fixincludes/README-fixinc include-fixed/README -+# chmod a+r include-fixed/README - $(STAMP) $@ - - .PHONY: install-gcc-tooldir -@@ -3087,10 +3087,7 @@ - (TARGET_MACHINE='$(target)'; srcdir=`cd $(srcdir); ${PWD_COMMAND}`; \ - SHELL='$(SHELL)'; MACRO_LIST=`${PWD_COMMAND}`/macro_list ; \ - gcc_dir=`${PWD_COMMAND}` ; \ -- export TARGET_MACHINE srcdir SHELL MACRO_LIST && \ -- cd $(build_objdir)/fixincludes && \ -- $(SHELL) ./fixinc.sh "$${gcc_dir}/$${fix_dir}" \ -- $(BUILD_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR) $(OTHER_FIXINCLUDES_DIRS) ); \ -+ export TARGET_MACHINE srcdir SHELL MACRO_LIST ); \ - rm -f $${fix_dir}/syslimits.h; \ - if [ -f $${fix_dir}/limits.h ]; then \ - mv $${fix_dir}/limits.h $${fix_dir}/syslimits.h; \ diff --git a/testing/source/gcc/patches/gfortran.deferred-shape-vs-assumed-shape.patch b/testing/source/gcc/patches/gfortran.deferred-shape-vs-assumed-shape.patch deleted file mode 100644 index f695b969e..000000000 --- a/testing/source/gcc/patches/gfortran.deferred-shape-vs-assumed-shape.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -[PATCH] deferred-shape vs assumed-shape -Steve Kargl sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu -Wed Apr 1 20:04:43 GMT 2020 - -See -https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60972134/whats-wrong-with-the-following-fortran-code-gfortran-dtio-dummy-argument-at - -Is A(:) a deferred-shape array or an assumed-shape array? The -answer of course depends on context. - -This patch fixes the issue found at the above URL. - -Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c -=================================================================== ---- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 280157) -+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy) -@@ -4916,10 +4916,15 @@ check_dtio_arg_TKR_intent (gfc_symbol *fsym, bool type - || ((type != BT_CLASS) && fsym->attr.dimension))) - gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at %L must be a scalar", - &fsym->declared_at); -- else if (rank == 1 -- && (fsym->as == NULL || fsym->as->type != AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE)) -- gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at %L must be an " -- "ASSUMED SHAPE ARRAY", &fsym->declared_at); -+ else if (rank == 1) -+ { -+ if (fsym->as == NULL -+ || !(fsym->as->type == AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE -+ || (fsym->as->type == AS_DEFERRED && fsym->attr.dummy -+ && !fsym->attr.allocatable && !fsym->attr.pointer))) -+ gfc_error ("DTIO dummy argument at %L must be an " -+ "ASSUMED-SHAPE ARRAY", &fsym->declared_at); -+ } - - if (type == BT_CHARACTER && fsym->ts.u.cl->length != NULL) - gfc_error ("DTIO character argument at %L must have assumed length", - --- -Steve - |