summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07')
-rw-r--r--source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07305
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 305 deletions
diff --git a/source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07 b/source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07
deleted file mode 100644
index 922802c5a..000000000
--- a/source/l/mpfr/patches/patch07
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,305 +0,0 @@
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES 2023-05-12 15:08:39.233546717 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES 2023-05-12 15:08:39.325546612 +0000
-@@ -0,0 +1 @@
-+pow_general
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION 2023-05-12 15:06:11.885721962 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION 2023-05-12 15:08:39.325546612 +0000
-@@ -1 +1 @@
--4.2.0-p6
-+4.2.0-p7
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h 2023-05-12 15:06:11.877721972 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h 2023-05-12 15:08:39.321546616 +0000
-@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
- #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4
- #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2
- #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0
--#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p6"
-+#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p7"
-
- /* User macros:
- MPFR_USE_FILE: Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/pow.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/pow.c
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/pow.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/pow.c 2023-05-12 15:08:39.309546630 +0000
-@@ -131,7 +131,6 @@
- /* Declaration of the size variable */
- mpfr_prec_t Nz = MPFR_PREC(z); /* target precision */
- mpfr_prec_t Nt; /* working precision */
-- mpfr_exp_t err; /* error */
- MPFR_ZIV_DECL (ziv_loop);
-
- MPFR_LOG_FUNC
-@@ -171,12 +170,14 @@
- MPFR_ZIV_INIT (ziv_loop, Nt);
- for (;;)
- {
-+ mpfr_exp_t err, exp_t;
- MPFR_BLOCK_DECL (flags1);
-
- /* compute exp(y*ln|x|), using MPFR_RNDU to get an upper bound, so
- that we can detect underflows. */
- mpfr_log (t, absx, MPFR_IS_NEG (y) ? MPFR_RNDD : MPFR_RNDU); /* ln|x| */
- mpfr_mul (t, y, t, MPFR_RNDU); /* y*ln|x| */
-+ exp_t = MPFR_GET_EXP (t);
- if (k_non_zero)
- {
- MPFR_LOG_MSG (("subtract k * ln(2)\n", 0));
-@@ -188,14 +189,16 @@
- MPFR_LOG_VAR (t);
- }
- /* estimate of the error -- see pow function in algorithms.tex.
-- The error on t is at most 1/2 + 3*2^(EXP(t)+1) ulps, which is
-- <= 2^(EXP(t)+3) for EXP(t) >= -1, and <= 2 ulps for EXP(t) <= -2.
-+ The error on t before the subtraction of k*log(2) is at most
-+ 1/2 + 3*2^(EXP(t)+1) ulps, which is <= 2^(EXP(t)+3) for EXP(t) >= -1,
-+ and <= 2 ulps for EXP(t) <= -2.
- Additional error if k_no_zero: treal = t * errk, with
- 1 - |k| * 2^(-Nt) <= exp(-|k| * 2^(-Nt)) <= errk <= 1,
- i.e., additional absolute error <= 2^(EXP(k)+EXP(t)-Nt).
-- Total error <= 2^err1 + 2^err2 <= 2^(max(err1,err2)+1). */
-- err = MPFR_NOTZERO (t) && MPFR_GET_EXP (t) >= -1 ?
-- MPFR_GET_EXP (t) + 3 : 1;
-+ Total ulp error <= 2^err1 + 2^err2 <= 2^(max(err1,err2)+1),
-+ where err1 = EXP(t)+3 for EXP(t) >= -1, and 1 otherwise,
-+ and err2 = EXP(k). */
-+ err = MPFR_NOTZERO (t) && exp_t >= -1 ? exp_t + 3 : 1;
- if (k_non_zero)
- {
- if (MPFR_GET_EXP (k) > err)
-@@ -328,11 +331,17 @@
- */
- if (rnd_mode == MPFR_RNDN && inexact < 0 && lk < 0 &&
- MPFR_GET_EXP (z) == __gmpfr_emin - 1 - lk && mpfr_powerof2_raw (z))
-- /* Rounding to nearest, real result > z * 2^k = 2^(emin - 2),
-- * underflow case: we will obtain the correct result and exceptions
-- * by replacing z by nextabove(z).
-- */
-- mpfr_nextabove (z);
-+ /* Rounding to nearest, exact result > z * 2^k = 2^(emin - 2),
-+ * and underflow case because the rounded result assuming an
-+ * unbounded exponent range is 2^(emin - 2). We need to round
-+ * to 2^(emin - 1), i.e. to round toward +inf.
-+ * Note: the old code was using "mpfr_nextabove (z);" instead of
-+ * setting rnd_mode to MPFR_RNDU for the call to mpfr_mul_2si, but
-+ * this was incorrect in precision 1 because in this precision,
-+ * mpfr_nextabove gave 2^(emin - 1), which is representable,
-+ * so that mpfr_mul_2si did not generate the wanted underflow
-+ * (the value was correct, but the underflow flag was missing). */
-+ rnd_mode = MPFR_RNDU;
- MPFR_CLEAR_FLAGS ();
- inex2 = mpfr_mul_2si (z, z, lk, rnd_mode);
- if (inex2) /* underflow or overflow */
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c 2023-05-12 15:06:11.885721962 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c 2023-05-12 15:08:39.325546612 +0000
-@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
- const char *
- mpfr_get_version (void)
- {
-- return "4.2.0-p6";
-+ return "4.2.0-p7";
- }
-diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/texp10.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/texp10.c
---- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/texp10.c 2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
-+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/texp10.c 2023-05-12 15:08:39.309546630 +0000
-@@ -190,6 +190,187 @@
- mpfr_clear (y);
- }
-
-+/* Bug in mpfr_pow_general found by ofuf_thresholds (on 2023-02-13 for
-+ a 32-bit exponent, changed on 2023-03-06 for a 64-bit exponent too),
-+ fixed in commit b62966df913f73f08b3c5252e1d0c702bc20442f.
-+ With a 32-bit exponent, failure for i=0.
-+ expected 0.1111E1073741823
-+ got @Inf@
-+ expected flags = inexact (8)
-+ got flags = overflow inexact (10)
-+ With a 64-bit exponent, failure for i=1.
-+ expected 0.11111111111111111111111E4611686018427387903
-+ got @Inf@
-+ expected flags = inexact (8)
-+ got flags = overflow inexact (10)
-+ Note: ofuf_thresholds was added to the master branch, but for the
-+ time being, there are issues with these tests.
-+*/
-+static void
-+bug20230213 (void)
-+{
-+ const char *s[2] = {
-+ "0x1.34413504b3ccdbd5dd8p+28",
-+ "0x1.34413509f79fef2c4e0dd14a7ae0ecfbacdbp+60"
-+ };
-+ mpfr_t x1, x2, y1, y2;
-+ mpfr_prec_t px[2] = { 74, 147 };
-+ mpfr_prec_t py[2] = { 4, 23 };
-+ mpfr_exp_t old_emax, emax;
-+ mpfr_flags_t flags1, flags2;
-+ int i;
-+
-+ old_emax = mpfr_get_emax ();
-+
-+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
-+ {
-+ if (i != 0)
-+ set_emax (MPFR_EMAX_MAX);
-+
-+ emax = mpfr_get_emax ();
-+
-+ mpfr_inits2 (px[i], x1, x2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+ mpfr_inits2 (py[i], y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+
-+ mpfr_setmax (y1, emax);
-+ mpfr_log10 (x1, y1, MPFR_RNDD);
-+ mpfr_set_str (x2, s[i], 0, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ /* For i == 0, emax == 2^30, so that the value can be checked.
-+ For i != 0, check the value for the case emax == 2^62.
-+ The "0UL" ensures that the shifts are valid. */
-+ if (i == 0 || (((0UL + MPFR_EMAX_MAX) >> 31) >> 30) == 1)
-+ {
-+ /* printf ("Checking x1 for i=%d\n", i); */
-+ MPFR_ASSERTN (mpfr_equal_p (x1, x2));
-+ }
-+
-+ /* Let MAXF be the maximum finite value (y1 above).
-+ Since x1 < log10(MAXF), one should have exp10(x1) < MAXF, and
-+ therefore, y2 = RU(exp10(x1)) <= RU(MAXF) = MAXF (no overflow). */
-+ flags1 = MPFR_FLAGS_INEXACT;
-+ mpfr_clear_flags ();
-+ mpfr_exp10 (y2, x1, MPFR_RNDU);
-+ flags2 = __gmpfr_flags;
-+
-+ if (! (mpfr_lessequal_p (y2, y1) && flags2 == flags1))
-+ {
-+ printf ("Error in bug20230213 for i=%d\n", i);
-+ printf ("emax = %" MPFR_EXP_FSPEC "d\n", (mpfr_eexp_t) emax);
-+ printf ("expected "); mpfr_dump (y1);
-+ printf ("got "); mpfr_dump (y2);
-+ printf ("expected flags =");
-+ flags_out (flags1);
-+ printf ("got flags =");
-+ flags_out (flags2);
-+ exit (1);
-+ }
-+
-+ mpfr_clears (x1, x2, y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+ }
-+
-+ set_emax (old_emax);
-+}
-+
-+/* Bug in mpfr_pow_general in precision 1 in the particular case of
-+ rounding to nearest, z * 2^k = 2^(emin - 2) and real result larger
-+ than this value; fixed in ff5012b61d5e5fee5156c57b8aa8fc1739c2a771
-+ (which is simplified in 4f5de980be290687ac1409aa02873e9e0dd1a030);
-+ initially found by ofuf_thresholds (though the test was incorrect).
-+ With a 32-bit exponent, failure for i=0.
-+ With a 64-bit exponent, failure for i=1.
-+ The result was correct, but the underflow flag was missing.
-+ Note: ofuf_thresholds was added to the master branch, but for the
-+ time being, there are issues with these tests.
-+*/
-+static void
-+bug20230427 (void)
-+{
-+ const char *s[2] = {
-+ "-0.1001101000100000100110101000011E29",
-+ "-0.100110100010000010011010100001001111101111001111111101111001101E61"
-+ };
-+ mpfr_t x, y, z, t1, t2;
-+ mpfr_exp_t old_emin;
-+ mpfr_flags_t flags, ex_flags;
-+ int i, inex;
-+
-+ old_emin = mpfr_get_emin ();
-+
-+ mpfr_init2 (x, 63);
-+ mpfr_inits2 (1, y, z, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+ mpfr_inits2 (128, t1, t2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+
-+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
-+ {
-+ if (i == 0)
-+ {
-+ /* Basic check: the default emin should be -2^30 (exactly). */
-+ if (mpfr_get_emin () != -1073741823)
-+ abort ();
-+ }
-+ else
-+ {
-+ /* This test assumes that MPFR_EMIN_MIN = -2^62 (exactly).
-+ The "0UL" ensures that the shifts are valid. */
-+ if ((((0UL - MPFR_EMIN_MIN) >> 31) >> 30) != 1)
-+ break;
-+
-+ set_emin (MPFR_EMIN_MIN);
-+ }
-+
-+ mpfr_set_str_binary (x, s[i]);
-+
-+ /* We will test 10^x rounded to nearest in precision 1.
-+ Check that 2^(emin - 2) < 10^x < (3/2) * 2^(emin - 2).
-+ This is approximate, but by outputting the values, one can check
-+ that one is not too close to the boundaries:
-+ emin - 2 = -4611686018427387905
-+ log2(10^x) ~= -4611686018427387904.598
-+ emin - 2 + log2(3/2) ~= -4611686018427387904.415
-+ Thus the result should be the smallest positive number 2^(emin - 1)
-+ because 10^x is closer to this number than to 0, the midpoint being
-+ 2^(emin - 2). And there should be an underflow in precision 1 because
-+ the result rounded to nearest in an unbounded exponent range should
-+ have been 2^(emin - 2), the midpoint being (3/2) * 2^(emin - 2).
-+ */
-+ mpfr_set_ui (t1, 10, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ mpfr_log2 (t2, t1, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ mpfr_mul (t1, t2, x, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ inex = mpfr_set_exp_t (t2, mpfr_get_emin () - 2, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ MPFR_ASSERTN (inex == 0);
-+ MPFR_ASSERTN (mpfr_greater_p (t1, t2)); /* log2(10^x) > emin - 2 */
-+ inex = mpfr_sub (t1, t1, t2, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ MPFR_ASSERTN (inex == 0);
-+ mpfr_set_ui (t2, 3, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ mpfr_log2 (t2, t2, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ mpfr_sub_ui (t2, t2, 1, MPFR_RNDN); /* log2(3/2) */
-+ MPFR_ASSERTN (mpfr_less_p (t1, t2));
-+
-+ mpfr_clear_flags ();
-+ mpfr_exp10 (y, x, MPFR_RNDN);
-+ flags = __gmpfr_flags;
-+ ex_flags = MPFR_FLAGS_UNDERFLOW | MPFR_FLAGS_INEXACT;
-+
-+ mpfr_setmin (z, mpfr_get_emin ()); /* z = 0.1@emin */
-+ if (! (mpfr_equal_p (y, z) && flags == ex_flags))
-+ {
-+ printf ("Error in bug20230427 for i=%d\n", i);
-+ printf ("expected "); mpfr_dump (z);
-+ printf ("got "); mpfr_dump (y);
-+ printf ("emin = %" MPFR_EXP_FSPEC "d\n",
-+ (mpfr_eexp_t) mpfr_get_emin ());
-+ printf ("expected flags =");
-+ flags_out (ex_flags);
-+ printf ("got flags =");
-+ flags_out (flags);
-+ exit (1);
-+ }
-+ }
-+
-+ mpfr_clears (x, y, z, t1, t2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
-+ set_emin (old_emin);
-+}
-+
- int
- main (int argc, char *argv[])
- {
-@@ -199,6 +380,9 @@
-
- tests_start_mpfr ();
-
-+ bug20230213 ();
-+ bug20230427 ();
-+
- special_overflow ();
- emax_m_eps ();
- exp_range ();