diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/x/x11/patch/xf86-video-intel/0001-sna-Let-modestting-glamor-handle-gen9.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/x/x11/patch/xf86-video-intel/0001-sna-Let-modestting-glamor-handle-gen9.patch | 41 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/source/x/x11/patch/xf86-video-intel/0001-sna-Let-modestting-glamor-handle-gen9.patch b/source/x/x11/patch/xf86-video-intel/0001-sna-Let-modestting-glamor-handle-gen9.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 75d719529..000000000 --- a/source/x/x11/patch/xf86-video-intel/0001-sna-Let-modestting-glamor-handle-gen9.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,41 +0,0 @@ -From 442ac0a20132f49fbfb37f05db9d90f04b13698d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> -Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:43:35 +0100 -Subject: [RFC/PATCH xf86-video-intel] sna: Let modestting + glamor handle - gen9+ - -sna has no meaningfull accel for gen9+, this causes problems with i.e. -apps using XVideo since the sprite XVideo support does not work well -for many apps. - -Therefor it is better to just let the xserver fall back to modesetting + -glamor. This is implemented by returning FALSE from the probe methods, -just like how nouveau handles falling back to modesetting for newer cards. - -BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305369 -Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> ---- - src/intel_module.c | 7 +++++++ - 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/intel_module.c b/src/intel_module.c -index 60835b9..5979cb9 100644 ---- a/src/intel_module.c -+++ b/src/intel_module.c -@@ -571,6 +571,13 @@ intel_scrn_create(DriverPtr driver, - return FALSE; - } - -+ /* -+ * We've no accel support for these, so let modesetting + glamor -+ * handle them. -+ */ -+ if ((unsigned)((struct intel_device_info *)match_data)->gen >= 0110) -+ return FALSE; -+ - scrn = xf86AllocateScreen(driver, flags); - if (scrn == NULL) - return FALSE; --- -2.7.2 - |