summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff')
-rw-r--r--source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff25
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff b/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff
deleted file mode 100644
index bd4b1466a..000000000
--- a/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
---- ./ps/parser.c.orig 2004-08-09 17:41:10.000000000 -0700
-+++ ./ps/parser.c 2004-08-16 18:30:09.000000000 -0700
-@@ -1213,12 +1213,20 @@
- // about "ps -aux" suddenly changing behavior if a user "x" were
- // added to the system.
- //
-+ // Yes, this is still getting patched out here. IMO, people can change
-+ // old habits if and when user 'x' comes along. I still find this warning
-+ // to be a POLA violation. No offense... that's the beauty of open source.
-+ // You've got your ideas about this, and I have mine, and we're allowed
-+ // to disagree. Nothing in the UNIX or POSIX standards requires this (annoying)
-+ // warning to be displayed, and we're not changing the actual behavior
-+ // of ps in any way. I know of no other 'ps' that produces this message.
-+ //
- // Also, a "-x" option is coming. It's already there in fact,
- // for some non-default personalities. So "ps -ax" will parse
- // as SysV options... and you're screwed if you've been patching
- // out the friendly warning. Cut-over is likely to be in 2005.
-- if(!(personality & PER_FORCE_BSD))
-- fprintf(stderr, "Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html\n");
-+ // if(!(personality & PER_FORCE_BSD))
-+ // fprintf(stderr, "Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html\n");
- // Remember: contact albert@users.sf.net or procps-feedback@lists.sf.net
- // if you should feel tempted. Be damn sure you understand all
- // the issues. The same goes for other stuff too, BTW. Please ask.