diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/l')
6 files changed, 353 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-002 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-002 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..453b9b85d --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-002 @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-002 + +Bug-Reported-by: srobertson@peratonlabs.com +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2022-09/msg00049.html + +Bug-Description: + +It's possible for readline to try to zero out a line that's not null- +terminated, leading to a memory fault. + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/display.c 2022-04-05 10:47:31.000000000 -0400 +--- display.c 2022-12-13 13:11:22.000000000 -0500 +*************** +*** 2684,2692 **** + + if (visible_line) +! { +! temp = visible_line; +! while (*temp) +! *temp++ = '\0'; +! } + rl_on_new_line (); + forced_display++; +--- 2735,2740 ---- + + if (visible_line) +! memset (visible_line, 0, line_size); +! + rl_on_new_line (); + forced_display++; +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 1 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 2 diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-003 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-003 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e9fe2c0d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-003 @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-003 + +Bug-Reported-by: Stefan Klinger <readline-gnu.org@stefan-klinger.de> +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2023-08/msg00018.html + +Bug-Description: + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +The custom color prefix that readline uses to color possible completions +must have a leading `.'. + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/colors.c 2021-12-08 11:38:25.000000000 -0500 +--- colors.c 2023-08-28 16:40:04.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 74,78 **** + static void restore_default_color (void); + +! #define RL_COLOR_PREFIX_EXTENSION "readline-colored-completion-prefix" + + COLOR_EXT_TYPE *_rl_color_ext_list = 0; +--- 74,78 ---- + static void restore_default_color (void); + +! #define RL_COLOR_PREFIX_EXTENSION ".readline-colored-completion-prefix" + + COLOR_EXT_TYPE *_rl_color_ext_list = 0; +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 2 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 3 diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-004 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-004 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d60c662ec --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-004 @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-004 + +Bug-Reported-by: Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gmail.com> +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2022-11/msg00044.html + +Bug-Description: + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +There are systems that supply one of select or pselect, but not both. + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/input.c 2022-04-08 15:43:24.000000000 -0400 +--- input.c 2022-11-28 09:41:08.000000000 -0500 +*************** +*** 152,156 **** +--- 152,158 ---- + int _rl_timeout_init (void); + int _rl_timeout_sigalrm_handler (void); ++ #if defined (RL_TIMEOUT_USE_SELECT) + int _rl_timeout_select (int, fd_set *, fd_set *, fd_set *, const struct timeval *, const sigset_t *); ++ #endif + + static void _rl_timeout_handle (void); +*************** +*** 249,253 **** + int chars_avail, k; + char input; +! #if defined(HAVE_SELECT) + fd_set readfds, exceptfds; + struct timeval timeout; +--- 251,255 ---- + int chars_avail, k; + char input; +! #if defined (HAVE_PSELECT) || defined (HAVE_SELECT) + fd_set readfds, exceptfds; + struct timeval timeout; +*************** +*** 806,810 **** + unsigned char c; + int fd; +! #if defined (HAVE_PSELECT) + sigset_t empty_set; + fd_set readfds; +--- 815,819 ---- + unsigned char c; + int fd; +! #if defined (HAVE_PSELECT) || defined (HAVE_SELECT) + sigset_t empty_set; + fd_set readfds; +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 3 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 4 diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-005 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-005 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..57f507f61 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-005 @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-005 + +Bug-Reported-by: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-09/msg00005.html + +Bug-Description: + +If an application is using readline in callback mode, and a signal arrives +after readline checks for it in rl_callback_read_char() but before it +restores the application's signal handlers, it won't get processed until the +next time the application calls rl_callback_read_char(). Readline needs to +check for and resend any pending signals after restoring the application's +signal handlers. + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/callback.c 2022-04-29 12:02:56.000000000 -0400 +--- callback.c 2022-10-11 10:59:06.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 116,120 **** + do { \ + if (rl_persistent_signal_handlers == 0) \ +! rl_clear_signals (); \ + return; \ + } while (0) +--- 116,123 ---- + do { \ + if (rl_persistent_signal_handlers == 0) \ +! { \ +! rl_clear_signals (); \ +! if (_rl_caught_signal) _rl_signal_handler (_rl_caught_signal); \ +! } \ + return; \ + } while (0) +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 4 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 5 diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-006 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-006 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9e315e889 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-006 @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-006 + +Bug-Reported-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-09/msg00001.html + +Bug-Description: + +This is a variant of the same issue as the one fixed by patch 5. In this +case, the signal arrives and is pending before readline calls rl_getc(). +When this happens, the pending signal will be handled by the loop, but may +alter or destroy some state that the callback uses. Readline needs to treat +this case the same way it would if a signal interrupts pselect/select, so +compound operations like searches and reading numeric arguments get cleaned +up properly. + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/input.c 2022-12-22 16:15:48.000000000 -0500 +--- input.c 2023-01-10 11:53:45.000000000 -0500 +*************** +*** 812,816 **** + rl_getc (FILE *stream) + { +! int result; + unsigned char c; + int fd; +--- 812,816 ---- + rl_getc (FILE *stream) + { +! int result, ostate, osig; + unsigned char c; + int fd; +*************** +*** 823,828 **** +--- 823,842 ---- + while (1) + { ++ osig = _rl_caught_signal; ++ ostate = rl_readline_state; ++ + RL_CHECK_SIGNALS (); + ++ #if defined (READLINE_CALLBACKS) ++ /* Do signal handling post-processing here, but just in callback mode ++ for right now because the signal cleanup can change some of the ++ callback state, and we need to either let the application have a ++ chance to react or abort some current operation that gets cleaned ++ up by rl_callback_sigcleanup(). If not, we'll just run through the ++ loop again. */ ++ if (osig != 0 && (ostate & RL_STATE_CALLBACK)) ++ goto postproc_signal; ++ #endif ++ + /* We know at this point that _rl_caught_signal == 0 */ + +*************** +*** 888,891 **** +--- 902,908 ---- + + handle_error: ++ osig = _rl_caught_signal; ++ ostate = rl_readline_state; ++ + /* If the error that we received was EINTR, then try again, + this is simply an interrupted system call to read (). We allow +*************** +*** 928,933 **** +--- 945,959 ---- + #endif /* SIGALRM */ + ++ postproc_signal: ++ /* POSIX says read(2)/pselect(2)/select(2) don't return EINTR for any ++ reason other than being interrupted by a signal, so we can safely ++ call the application's signal event hook. */ + if (rl_signal_event_hook) + (*rl_signal_event_hook) (); ++ #if defined (READLINE_CALLBACKS) ++ else if (osig == SIGINT && (ostate & RL_STATE_CALLBACK) && (ostate & (RL_STATE_ISEARCH|RL_STATE_NSEARCH|RL_STATE_NUMERICARG))) ++ /* just these cases for now */ ++ _rl_abort_internal (); ++ #endif + } + } +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 5 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 6 diff --git a/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-007 b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-007 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0394e0bb --- /dev/null +++ b/source/l/readline/readline-8.2-patches/readline82-007 @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + READLINE PATCH REPORT + ===================== + +Readline-Release: 8.2 +Patch-ID: readline82-007 + +Bug-Reported-by: Kevin Pulo <kev@pulo.com.au> +Bug-Reference-ID: +Bug-Reference-URL: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-11/msg00002.html + +Bug-Description: + +If readline is called with no prompt, it should display a newline if return +is typed on an empty line. It should still suppress the final newline if +return is typed on the last (empty) line of a multi-line command. + +Patch (apply with `patch -p0'): + +*** ../readline-8.2-patched/display.c 2022-04-05 10:47:31.000000000 -0400 +--- display.c 2022-12-13 13:11:22.000000000 -0500 +*************** +*** 3342,3348 **** + &last_face[_rl_screenwidth - 1 + woff], 1); + } +! _rl_vis_botlin = 0; +! if (botline_length > 0 || _rl_last_c_pos > 0) + rl_crlf (); + fflush (rl_outstream); + rl_display_fixed++; +--- 3394,3400 ---- + &last_face[_rl_screenwidth - 1 + woff], 1); + } +! if ((_rl_vis_botlin == 0 && botline_length == 0) || botline_length > 0 || _rl_last_c_pos > 0) + rl_crlf (); ++ _rl_vis_botlin = 0; + fflush (rl_outstream); + rl_display_fixed++; +*** ../readline-8.2/patchlevel 2013-11-15 08:11:11.000000000 -0500 +--- patchlevel 2014-03-21 08:28:40.000000000 -0400 +*************** +*** 1,3 **** + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 6 +--- 1,3 ---- + # Do not edit -- exists only for use by patch + +! 7 |